Securing a $185,000 Settlement Despite Minimal Vehicle Damage and Pre-Existing Conditions

In a recent car accident case, our client faced circumstances that could have made it difficult to fully demonstrate the extent of her injuries. A truck pulled out in front of her, forcing her to brake hard to avoid a more serious collision. She nearly succeeded, but the front left of her vehicle clipped the rear of the truck.

The impact caused relatively minor vehicle damage, but minor property damage does not necessarily mean a person has not been injured. Our client also had pre-existing medical conditions, including rheumatoid arthritis, which added another layer of complexity to evaluating her injuries and damages. When someone has an existing condition, insurance companies may question whether symptoms were caused or worsened by the collision rather than the underlying condition.

Careful preparation was especially important. By developing the medical evidence, understanding our client’s condition before and after the crash, and presenting how the collision affected her, we were able to secure a $185,000 settlement on her behalf.

This case is an important reminder that the appearance of a vehicle does not tell the whole story about an injury claim. Pre-existing conditions do not automatically prevent an injured person from recovering compensation when an accident aggravates or worsens an existing condition. Every case depends on its particular facts and medical evidence.

At Reed Firm, we focus on understanding those details, preparing cases thoroughly, and giving our clients straightforward guidance throughout the process. Passion for People. Obsession with Justice.